Select Page

Tea Party Challenges

At a recent dinner, I asked a friend of mine if he would join me as a supporter of the Tea Party but he balked at the idea. This intrigued me; I know that he champions smaller government and fiscal responsibility – policies the Tea Party stands for as well. When I pressed him, he admitted that there’s a feeling about the Tea Party that makes him uncomfortable.

This got me thinking. My experience with the Tea Party movement, at least in New York, has been nothing less than superb. I’ve met a true cross-section of people – entrepreneurs, office workers, doctors, retirees, young people. They are intelligent, decently educated, passionate individuals. It astounds me that there is a great disconnect between what the Tea Party stands for and what the public perspective is. People need to understand that the Tea Party is not what the press portrays it to be – it is not out-of-touch, crazy, or reactionary. The Tea Party is about smaller government, lower taxes, the Constitution, and individual liberty. That’s it.

I am sure that there are Tea Party followers who have off-the-mainstream and even strange opinions, as do followers of any group. For instances, some Tea Partiers may be pro-immigration, while others may not be. It doesn’t matter; that is, there is no right or reason for any Tea Partier to be saying anything about immigration reform in the context of the Tea Party. Such opinions are not relevant to their Tea Party association. And though these ancillary opinions would be disregarded in other organizations, they become front and center – for liberals and the press – who want to diminish the Tea Party or try to sow discord.

The Tea Party is a movement of ordinary American people who share an excellent philosophy. The fact that they continue to be targeted, tarred, and trashed by the left-wing media should be an outrage to all Americans.

The Tea Party will be successful by continuing to impress upon Americans – person by person – the need for restraint in government, in taxes, and in spending.

Rebuttal to the State of the Union

The truth about Obama’s remarks:

#1) ON TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY: “And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break. It’s not a matter of punishing their success. It’s about promoting America’s success”.

FACT: The highest-income earners are the greatest investors. Investment is much more stimulative than consumptive spending; raising the tax margin punishes the earners and the economy – while theat extra revenue will go straight to the government. These top 2% earners also provide nearly 50% of small business income in this country; by targeting them, Obama is also hurting businesses.

#2) ON FIXING THE TAX CODE: “Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries. Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world”

FACT: This is purely populist rhetoric. Accountants and lawyers do not eliminate tax liabilities. And it is not so much lobbyists as it is legislators pandering for votes who put in provisions intended to help their own individual special interests. This happened in the 1986 Tax Act under Ronald Reagan, when tax rates from 50% to 28% in exchange for a large number of deductions and writeoffs. However, the ink was barely dry when Congress used that as an opportunity to jack the rates up from 28% to 39.6% — which lasted until the Bush tax cuts pushed them back a little bit.

#3) ON A FEDERAL FREEZE FOR FIVE YEARS: “I am proposing that starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. This would reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president”.

FACT: Obama’s federal freeze comes after he has increased our spending 25% in two

years. We need to go back to FY2008 and start from there.

#4) ON JOB CREATION: “We’ll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology – an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people”

FACT: “Invest” is just code for increased government spending. Here’s an example of the government picking industry winners and losers, something they have no business – or qualifications – doing. This policy will result in a net job losses – taking away from market directed companies in order to subsidize activities that cannot justify investment by the free market. A better and more impacting idea would be to give businesses research credits that companies could use and develop on their own.

#5) ON CLEAN TECHNOLOGY: “Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling. So tonight, I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal: by 2035, 80% of America’s electricity will come from clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas”.

FACT: There is no clear consensus on the best type of clean energy. This only means continued uncertainty in the business markets, which will hamper the rate of recovery.