Select Page

CNN Gets New York’s Future Wrong

As a lifelong New Yorker and fan of Jerry Seinfeld, I really wanted to like CNN’s article,“Jerry Seinfeld is right about New York’s future.”  The more I read it however, the more delusional it became until it was outright laughable.  The author, Jeffery Sachs, attempts to explain why New York will not fail and he’s right that the city has had tough times before. He’s correct that there will be a day of reckoning. But he is utterly incorrect that this reckoning is “between the superrich and the rest.”

Sachs has decided to lay the blame of the current state of New York City on the feet of the highest income earners, outright suggesting that the rich have gotten richer on the backs of those experiencing financial desperation and hunger due to the pandemic. It’s not the elected officials. It’s not the rioters. It’s not the bungled COVID-19 responses. It’s the billionaires. You can’t make this up:

NYC has more billionaires than any other city in the world — 111 in 2019. They like NYC, like the rest of us. They depend on NYC for their vast fortunes. And many have enjoyed astounding windfalls of wealth this year as frontline workers around them have died or faced eviction. The true challenge for New York City is not technology or even the pandemic. It is basic decency. A city survives and thrives as a living breathing social organism, one that acts together for the common good. The billionaires must be the ones paying higher taxes to keep the City’s schools, hospitals, public transport and social services running as NYC picks itself up from the crisis.”

What Jeffery Sach either fails to realize or purposefully omits is that the billionaires are already paying far in excess of any rational share of taxes to keep the City’s schools, hospitals, public transport and social services running as NYC picks itself up from the crisis.  Highest income earners pay the top rates, including 8.82% in state income taxes along with an extra 3.876% in NYC income taxes. Add to that the 40.8% marginal federal income tax rate  — and billionaires pay an income tax rate of over 53%! That’s 119 people paying 53% of their taxes for $8.5 million people and justice warriors want them to pay more? It’s not like these billionaires are using more services.

What’s really going on is that Jeffery Sachs is helping to shape the narrative that billionaires need to pay (more of) their fair share. Is it any coincidence that a new “Make Billionaires Pay” campaign by progressive lawmakers and activists is being debated right now in New York as some sort of a budget justice initiative? They want to add a new form of capital gains tax on those exceeding $1 billion in assets. 

A fundamental principle of our American heritage and history says that you don’t take something from somebody just because they have it. That is the approach of a crook. When Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he famously replied, “because that’s where the money is.” Of course it’s a joke, but it seems like de Blasio didn’t get the joke. Crooks do that, not civil society. As Walter Williams said, “If one person has a right to something he did not earn, it means that another person does not have a right to something he did earn.” 

Rather than cutting spending and government services, these fiscally ignorant crusaders take the easy way out and blame the very people who provide the vast majority of the income NYC receives–and then subsequently squanders through bad policy and abysmal leadership. But they aren’t satisfied. They want more. And unlike Jerry Seinfeld, that’s just not funny.

NYC Public Schools are Incompetent

The‌ ‌NYC‌ ‌public‌ ‌schools‌ ‌are‌ ‌now‌ ‌supposed‌ ‌to‌ ‌begin‌ ‌opening‌ ‌on‌ ‌September‌ ‌29,‌ ‌but‌ ‌unions‌ ‌continue‌ ‌to‌ ‌be‌ ‌apprehensive‌ ‌about‌ ‌in-person‌ ‌instruction.‌ ‌De‌ ‌Blasio‌ ‌already‌ ‌delayed‌ ‌school‌ ‌opening‌ ‌twice‌ ‌this‌ ‌year‌ ‌after‌ ‌ongoing‌ ‌threats‌ ‌of‌ ‌a‌ ‌teacher‌ ‌strike,‌ ‌‌citing‌ ‌“‌concerns‌ ‌raised‌ ‌by‌ ‌our‌ ‌labor‌ ‌partners.‌”‌‌ ‌On‌ ‌the‌ ‌other‌ ‌hand‌ ‌NYC‌ ‌charter‌ ‌and‌ ‌private‌ ‌schools‌ ‌have‌ ‌a‌ ‌variety‌ ‌of‌ ‌‌re-opening‌ ‌options‌‌ ‌other‌ ‌than‌ ‌virtual:‌ ‌from‌ ‌fully‌ ‌in-person‌ ‌to‌ ‌hybrid‌ ‌to‌ ‌outdoor‌ ‌classrooms.‌ ‌The‌ ‌contrast‌ ‌in‌ ‌competency‌ ‌is‌ ‌astounding.‌ ‌ ‌

The‌ ‌schools‌ ‌have‌ ‌been‌ ‌fully‌ ‌closed‌ ‌for‌ ‌six‌ ‌months‌ ‌because‌ ‌of‌ ‌COVID,‌ ‌and‌ ‌it’s‌ ‌not‌ ‌like‌ ‌educators‌ ‌didn’t‌ ‌know‌ ‌that‌ ‌their‌ ‌singular‌ ‌task‌ ‌of‌ ‌providing‌ ‌education‌ ‌to‌ ‌children‌ ‌would‌ ‌resume‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌fall.‌ ‌Nor‌ ‌are‌ ‌NYC‌ ‌public‌ ‌schools‌ ‌the‌ ‌only‌ ‌education‌ ‌system‌ ‌to‌ ‌face‌ ‌COVID.‌ ‌Virtually‌ ‌the‌ ‌entire‌ ‌country‌ ‌has‌ ‌had‌ ‌to‌ ‌come‌ ‌up‌ ‌with‌ ‌plans‌ ‌to‌ ‌safely‌ ‌re-open‌ ‌schools,‌ ‌and‌ ‌yet‌ ‌NYC‌ ‌public‌ ‌schools‌ ‌continue‌ ‌to‌ ‌be‌ ‌unprepared‌ ‌and‌ ‌incompetent.‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

De‌ ‌Blasio‌ ‌has‌ ‌proven‌ ‌incapable‌ ‌of‌ ‌negotiating‌ ‌with‌ ‌the‌ ‌unions,‌ ‌and‌ ‌in‌ ‌doing‌ ‌so,‌ ‌he‌ ‌has‌ ‌let‌ ‌down‌ ‌students‌ ‌and‌ ‌parents.‌ ‌This‌ ‌inability‌ ‌to‌ ‌effectively‌ ‌execute‌ ‌a‌ ‌plan‌ ‌to‌ ‌help‌ ‌students‌ ‌learn‌ ‌is‌ ‌perhaps‌ ‌the‌ ‌strongest‌ ‌argument‌ ‌to‌ ‌date‌ ‌as‌ ‌to‌ ‌why‌ ‌charter‌ ‌and‌ ‌private‌ ‌schools‌ ‌should‌ ‌really‌ ‌be‌ ‌the‌ ‌models‌ ‌we‌ ‌move‌ ‌towards‌ ‌in‌ ‌order‌ ‌to‌ ‌provide‌ ‌quality‌ ‌21st‌ ‌century‌ ‌learning‌ ‌to‌ ‌our‌ ‌children.‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

Disappointed With Dimon

I was disgusted to read Jamie Dimon’s new initiative, the “New York Jobs CEO Council,” not because I oppose gainful employment for New Yorkers, but because Dimon completely gives a free pass to the New York education system with this program. He misses an opportunity – and ignores his responsibility – to help improve a clearly broken system.

Dimon spends most of his op-ed talking about “skills-based hiring and matching,” but completely ignores the elephant in the room: New York’s education system is failing our kids. He describes how, “The council will create sustained pathways for opportunities in the city, better aligning educational programs with skills that employers need as the demands of the labor market rapidly evolve. This will alleviate unemployment—filling currently open jobs through skills training and empowering communities for the jobs of the future.”  Quite frankly, this is PR-speak nonsense.  New Yorkers are bereft of a decent education system, which is strangled by public school unions, and exacerbated by the fact that Mayor de Blasio is abusively hostile to charter and religious schools, even though those schools consistently outperform public schools — especially among black and Hispanic students. 

If Dimon really wanted to make a difference, he would blast de Blasio on the sub-standard New York education system, but instead, he’s joining forces with him. This is an embarrassment, a detriment of rank-and-file New Yorkers. You would think Dimon would be smart enough to know that he’s in bed with New York politicians and playing politics with regular New Yorkers, but perhaps he thinks he can get away with being so political just because he’s the CEO and chairman of JPMorgan Chase. 

New York “Donor State” Sham

New York Governor Cuomo continues his crusade for a state bailout by claiming that New York is a “donor state” and therefore entitled to more federal funds. By this, he means that New York gives more in tax revenue to Washington than it gets back. However, the “donor state” mantra and his calculations making that claim are incorrect.  

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal, “New York is No ‘Donor’ State,” did a thorough breakdown on how to calculate and account for federal funds in order to better understand the ebb and flow of dollars in and out of states. In this, it showed that New York really isn’t a donor state at all. It seems that various “donor state” claims tend to cling to a Rockefeller Institute report published in 2017 that erroneously calculated what states receive. For instance, it counted both food stamps and servicemen’s paychecks as federal subsidies when that’s clearly not the case. Likewise, it omitted the federal subsidization of municipal debt issuance and also didn’t account for the implicit socialization of their unfunded pensions and postemployment benefits. Thus, in reality, New York is one of several high-tax blue states that “are net ‘receivers’ of federal funds.” The aforementioned article is a definitely worthwhile read.

But even if the donor state claim were true to some degree, it’s still a weak argument for a bailout. Any notable imbalances occur for several reasons that Cuomo refuses to even consider. For instance, the federal tax code is very progressive and New Yorkers have high incomes. Likewise, New York receives relatively less money in the form of federal contracts and federal employee wages. This is logically caused by the fact that New York has made itself such a terrible place to do business (including sky-high costs and ridiculously burdensome regulation and taxes) that it can’t compete for these projects. Furthermore, the flow of New York taxpayer money to Washington and back has virtually nothing to do with why the New York government can’t balance its budget due to overspending. The government is not the taxpayer. The states send no money to Washington – their earners do. 

In other words, it’s not that the government is being shortchanged. The state government isn’t hurt by this at all.  The taxpayers of New York are the ones hurt by perennial fiscal mismanagement and it is a sham to request a bailout under the guise of being a donor state.

Michael Hendrix and Reopening NYC

I am a long-term supporter of the Manhattan Institute and participate in their events and webcasts regularly. Heather MacDonald, Steve Malanga, and Nicole Gelinas are three of my favorite people. But Michael Hendrix seriously dropped the ball as moderator of the discussion on “Planning for the City’s Reopening” several weeks ago. Given the current pandemic and civil unrest, exploring how business can reopen is a laudable topic; however, the actual discussion was immensely disappointing. He allowed it to simply ignore the real reasons for the problems the City now faces with regard to “reopening”.

For instance, during the question on how we were going to reopen the city, much of the conversation had to do with needing to do more with affordable housing, and needing more help from the city government. He of course knows that this has nothing to do with the “reopening”. The problem long preceded COVID, and doesn’t need the government to fix it. Government actions – zoning, land use, overburdening businesses and building regulations leading to ridiculously high costs – are the cause of lack of affordable housing, and without reversing those actual issues, there is no solution.

Additionally, the “racial crisis” was a significant topic. He ignored any response regarding whether this was true and/or meaningful since the City has been run by extraordinarily liberal, non-racist leaders for generations, including full representation of the minority community. Can racial bias then really be a thing in New York City? Also in every single major city in which there has been extensive looting and rioting, the cities have been in the hands of minorities and liberals for the past 50 years. Yet he as the moderator didn’t even allow for this perspective to come up.

Furthermore, there was absolutely no discussion about the rioters and looters destroying businesses; the conversation only focused on police brutality. Though police brutality may be a problem, is it really a factor in the reopening after COVID? For a panel exploring the city and businesses, it was egregious that he virtually ignored the very real problem: businesses that have been destroyed by looters and rioters are being ignored by law enforcement, making businesses hesitant to invest in reopening and insurers hesitant in providing insurance at affordable rates.

Another topic was education, but there was no mention about charter schools and how they fit into the equation of reopening, even though charter schools are the most successful educational endeavor in the city. 

Likewise, another topic was insurance, which he allowed to proceed in a manner that just showed the economic ignorance of the panelists. Since the happening of a pandemic is not a quantifiable risk, it is not insurable. To insist that the government provide insurance, at a premium that can only be set politically, has many problems. What’s more, the ignorance of the position espoused – that the government should somehow make the insurers who did not provide or charge for such coverage pay for it anyway – should not have been allowed to go unanswered.

On a related note, there was talk about how the city may or may not be able to help because there is a budget crisis. But where was the mention that DeBlasio is the cause? There was already a budget crisis before the pandemic and the civil unrest, not because of it. And DeBlasio’s actions during the pandemic and protests will certainly inhibit the ability of the City to reopen.

Hendrix should have made sure that the discussion included the knowledge and competence that the people of the Manhattan Institute espouse. There is no question in my mind that Heather MacDonald, Steve Malanga, and Nicole Gelinas would have been very disappointed with the exchange.

New York’s Budget Solution

For years, I’ve been pounding the table about how public sector wages and compensations have steadily outpaced those found in the private sector. This is no more readily apparent than in New York where runaway budgets and deficits continuously fleece the taxpayer. 

The private sector has several factors in place that help control runaway costs, chief among them being competition. The profit motive in the private sector keeps compensation at levels where economic factors limit them to their true market value, reflecting economically rational and fair compensation levels. On the other hand, there are no such competitive inhibitions in the public sector where politics and cronyism, rather than economics, create a fairy-tale negotiation for wages and benefits.

Here’s a tale of two states: New York and Florida. In New York, it is clear that public service unions are a significant reason why the cost of living is higher.  In 2010, Florida’s population was 18.8 million while New York’s was 19.3 million. In the past ten years, New York experienced population stagnation (19.4m) while in Florida, the population grew to 21.8 million and continues to be one of the fastest growing states in the country. Yet crucially, over the same period, New York’s budget increased to $177 billion while Florida’s was a mere $93 billion, up from 70.4 billion in 2010. One could argue that New York does more for its people than Florida does, but the reality is that they just spend more money. Bloated public service payrolls and off-the-charts cost burdens of regulation are the main culprits. And that’s the problem.

I propose that the people of New York withdraw its authorization to its elected officials to enter into any contracts with public service unions that provide compensation, benefits, and terms in excess of those being paid for similar work and skills in the private sector. Furthermore, there should be a requirement that restricts any federal government employee from receiving a raise if it puts his compensation in excess of the benefits and wages paid for the same work in the private sector.

By “competing” per se with the private sector for compensation, the government can do its part to help keep its budget and deficits from getting any more out of control.

New York’s Indefensible Bailout

New York’s state budget director, Robert F. Mujica, Jr., wrote an anemic, laughable Letter to the Editor (printed in the Wall Street Journal) trying to defend New York’s fiscal record in an effort to get a federal bailout. Those of us who live in New York couldn’t help but notice it was full of half-truths. For instance, Mr. Mujica boasted lowering income-tax rates, but neglected to include the fact that Florida doesn’t even have an income tax yet still manages to operate on a budget of $93 million vs NY’s $177 million — in a state with 2 million more people!

Furthermore, he talks about a 20% increase of private-sector jobs, but leaves out the fact that “private job growth in Florida has been about 60% higher than in New York from Jan 2010 to Jan 2020.”

Likewise, he claims that New Yorkers send $29 billion more in taxes to the federal government than it gets back, but fails to mention that the reason for this is New York’s tax code punishes high income earners by adding extra taxes, so much that some earners pay nearly 50% of their earnings in taxes! Nor does he mention that many wealthy New Yorkers have wised up to being fleeced over the last decade, making New York one of the top ten out-migration states in order for earners to try to keep their own income — some going to Florida, no less. This loss undoubtedly contributes to the $6 billion budget shortfall that existed before Coronavirus even hit, something that was also conveniently left out of his defense.

Finally, Mr. Mujica tries to suggest that the $29 billion New Yorkers send to the federal government somehow subsidizes Florida’s budget because Florida receives $30 billion more from the federal government than Floridians send. But he leaves out the fact that New York’s budget contains 35.9% of federal money compared to Florida’s 32.8%. With a budget of $177 billion, that’s $63 billion of spending from federal dollars compared to $30 billion in Florida. Who is more fiscally irresponsible?

If states like New York are not willing to take any of the economic risk going forward, they should not get any money. They have willfully chosen to engage in a prolonged economic lockdown in hopes that someone else pays for it. Florida was one of the last states to shut down and has begun opening up once again, understanding the need for economic recovery. If New York wants to continue to take the economic risk of staying closed while other localities choose to reopen, they should be the ones to pay for it.

Cuomo Unhinged

In a continued tantrum against the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” Governor Cuomo called the tax changes an “economic missile” as he unveiled his new budget proposal for the fiscal year. His solution? Raise more taxes mainly on businesses and restructure certain taxes so that New York gets its share of the pie.

One major change Cuomo has proposed is to eliminate the state income tax on wages for many New Yorkers; it would be replaced by a new payroll tax paid for by employers. This would be an disastrous burden for New York businesses who would conceivably have to cut wages in order to cover the cost of such a tax and deal with an excessive amount of increased paperwork.

Other ridiculous ideas include: a) a 2-cents-per-milligram tax on all opioids produced, paid for by the drug manufacturer; b) expanding the internet sales tax, a measure that has already failed twice; c)  a 10-cents-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, paid for by the distributors; and d) a $120 “safety inspection fee” for motor coaches, ambulances, and other for-hire, for-profit cars that carry passengers subject to inspection by the DoT.

Just as egregious is Cuomo’s proposal to go after health insurers who stand to benefit from the tax reform bill. As some insurers could see up to a 40% reduction on their federal corporate taxes, Cuomo wants to pick their pockets by implementing a 14 percent surcharge on those gains in order to close the budget deficits.

For a governor who once emphasized his fiscal restraint, this budget shows how unhinged and out-of-touch with New Yorkers and New York businesses Cuomo has become.

Amazon, Beware!

It is utterly laughable that Amazon has announced that the New York City metropolitan area is among the final potential locations for Amazon’s second headquarters.

New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo is consistently anti-business, with burdensome regulations that are tort lawyers dream, always in the top three of highest taxes in the country, a Tax Department renown for its invasiveness, and consistently threatening to raise taxes on his most successful constituents.  

Mayor Bill de Blasio of NY City is practically a self-proclaimed socialist.  He has stated “xxxxxxxxx”.  New York City has its own set of Corporation, S Corporation, partnership, LLC, and individual taxes that is added on top of the State level taxes. Many of these taxes were originally intended to be temporary decades ago, but have never been allowed to expire.  It is so expensive to operate in NY City, that virtually all viable businesses exist solely to service NYC individuals and entities that are located there. NY City is also consistently ranked as one of the worst states to do business, coupled with the highest tax burden in the nation.  

It appears that the only possible reason that Amazon could be interested in NY City is that it has extraordinarily liberal/socialist executives. If that is the case, investors in Amazon may need to watch out!

 

Governor Cuomo: Clueless or Dangerous?

Governor Cuomo has come out blasting the new tax law, and in particular the substantial reduction in the deduction for State and Local Taxes (“SALT”), as unconstitutional and an “attack only on blue states.”

But everybody who has any knowledge of taxation and its constitutionality knows that Cuomo’s assertion is ludicrous. The SALT deduction – and ALL deductions – are at the complete discretion of Congress.  And as long as deductions apply under the same rules to every taxpayer no matter where situated, constitutionality can never be an issue  All the Governor’s raving does is show that he and his entire staff are either totally clueless,  or they know that their statements are total nonsense, but think so little of voters that they can be fired up with something that is utterly phony.

If Cuomo is concerned about what is devastating to New Yorkers, it is astounding that he is objecting to this law and yet he did not object to other tax issues in the past that clearly targeted his constituents. Despite acknowledging the very bad effects of high taxes on New Yorkers,  Where was Cuomo’s concern when:

1) the federal government (Obama) raised taxes on capital gains by almost 60%?
2) the federal government raised the regular rate by 25%?

Furthermore:

1) Cuomo reneged on his campaign promises and kept income tax rates on New York’s high income earners outrageously high,
2) he continues to hide from his constituents that his tax law already denies New Yorkers some or all of their deduction for SALT.
3) he continues to hide that NY tax law also denies middle and high income earners significant parts of the charitable deduction as well, buried so deep that most New Yorkers are not even aware they are being fleeced.
4) as a final point, a New Yorker who dies leaving $10 million to his heirs would now pay no federal estate tax – but he would owe $1.06 million to New York State.

But now Cuomo is bothered by the elimination of the SALT deduction in New York? He was AFFIRMATIVELY IN FAVOR of all of these past provisions,  which have been devastating to his constituents for some time.  Cuomo’s sudden compassion is complete hypocrisy.