by | ARTICLES, GOVERNMENT, TAX TIPS, TAXES
Interest Rates Remain the Same for the Second Quarter of 2016
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service today announced that interest rates will remain the same for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2016. The rates will be:
- three (3) percent for overpayments [two (2) percent in the case of a corporation];
- one-half (0.5) percent for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000.
- three (3) percent for underpayments; and
- five (5) percent for large corporate underpayments.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, the rate of interest is determined on a quarterly basis. For taxpayers other than corporations, the overpayment and underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points.
Generally, in the case of a corporation, the underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points and the overpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 2 percentage points. The rate for large corporate underpayments is the federal short-term rate plus 5 percentage points. The rate on the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the federal short-term rate plus one-half (0.5) of a percentage point.
The interest rates announced today are computed from the federal short-term rate determined during Jan. 2016 to take effect Feb. 1, 2016, based on daily compounding.
Revenue Ruling 2016-06, announcing the rates of interest, is attached and will appear in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2016-13, dated March 28, 2016.
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, ECONOMY, FREEDOM, GOVERNMENT, POLITICS, TAXES
The great Don Boudreaux a friend of mine, made mention of this picture last week over on his superb blog, Cafe Hayek. The picture is apparently a favorite among Trump supporters.
“What to say? Perry Potts Eidelbus, a Facebook friend, describes it as “a distillation of economic ignorance into pure form.” Indeed. It’s much like Trump himself: the very image of economic ignorance.
Trump is doing now from the political right what Paul Krugman has done so successfully over the past decade and a half from the political left, which is the following: boisterously assuring people that their untutored instincts about the economy are indeed accurate – telling people that what they immediately see in economic affairs and policies is all that there is to see in economic affairs and policies (that is, that there is no ‘unseen’ whose reality can be perceived and understood only by looking beyond that which is immediately obvious). According to this bastardized, pandering version of economics, actual consumable goods (such as are pictured here) are reckoned to be costs, while toil is reckoned to be a benefit. The economic problem is not rooted in scarcity, it is rooted in abundance. Social benefactors, therefore, are those who promise to deny to us the fruits of the economy’s abundance (along with, by the way, our economic freedoms) as they bestow upon us ever-greater scarcity that will bless us with the need for more toil.
The photo shown here is, in short, itself an intellectual cargo ship loaded down with countless tons of economic ignorance.”
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, CONSTITUTION, ELECTIONS, FREEDOM, GOVERNMENT, OBAMA, POLITICS, TAXES
Obama weighed in on the current Apple-government dispute, saying that access should be made necessary.
From Reuters:
U.S. President Barack Obama on Friday made a passionate case for mobile devices to be built in such a way as to allow government to gain access to personal data if needed to prevent a terrorist attack or enforce tax laws.
Speaking at the South by Southwest festival in Texas, Obama said he could not comment on the legal case in which the FBI is trying to force Apple Inc. to allow access to an iPhone linked to San Bernardino, California, shooter Rizwan Farook.
But he made clear that, despite his commitment to Americans’ privacy and civil liberties, a balance was needed to allow some intrusion when needed.
“The question we now have to ask is: If technologically it is possible to make an impenetrable device or system where the encryption is so strong that there is no key, there’s no door at all, then how do we apprehend the child pornographer, how do we solve or disrupt a terrorist plot?” he said.
“What mechanisms do we have available to even do simple things like tax enforcement because if in fact you can’t crack that at all, government can’t get in, then everybody is walking around with a Swiss bank account in their pocket.”
The Justice Department has sought to frame the Apple case as one not about undermining encryption. A U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation court order issued to Apple targets a non-encryption barrier on one iPhone.
The FBI says Farook and his wife were inspired by Islamist militants when they shot and killed 14 people on Dec. 2 at a holiday party in California. The couple later died in a shootout with police.
“Setting aside the specific case between the FBI and Apple, … we’re going to have to make some decisions about how do we balance these respective risks,” Obama said.
“My conclusion so far is you cannot take an absolutist view.”
Obama was speaking at the South by Southwest festival in Austin about how government and technology companies can work together to solve problems including making it easier for people to vote.
by | ARTICLES, BUSINESS, ECONOMY, GOVERNMENT, OBAMA, POLITICS, TAX TIPS, TAXES
CNSNews remains a go-to source for analyzing information on the U.S. Treasury, tax revenue, and such. Here they are again, scrutinizing tax receipts for FY2016 through the end of February. In a nutshell, the U.S. government continues to run a deficit, and the amount of taxpayer responsibility continues to increase. From CNSNEWS:
The U.S. Treasury hauled in a record of approximately $1,248,371,000,000 in tax revenues in the first five months of fiscal 2016 (Oct. 1, 2015 through Feb. 29, 2016), according to the Monthly Treasury Statement released today.
Despite these record tax revenues in the first five months of the fiscal year, the federal government nonetheless ran a deficit of approximately $353,005,000,000 during the same period.
In February alone, the Treasury ran a deficit of $192,614,000,000.
The record five-month tax haul of $1,248,371,000,000 equaled approximately $8,263 for each of the 151,074,000 people in the country who had either a full or part-time job in February.
The record taxes in the first five months of this fiscal year exceed by about $63,263,220,000 in constant 2016 dollars the then-record $1,185,107,780,000 in tax revenues (in constant 2016 dollars) that the Treasury took in during the first five months of fiscal 2015.
However, even while taking in a record $1,248,371,000,000 in tax revenues from October through February, the Treasury was spending $1,601,375,000,000, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement. Thus, so far this fiscal year, the Treasury has run a deficit of $353,005,000,000.
The largest source of revenue in the first five months of this fiscal year was the individual income tax, which brought the Treasury $597,524,000,000. The second largest source was Social Security and other payroll taxes, which brought in $428,181,000,000.
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, BUSINESS, ECONOMY, FREEDOM, GOVERNMENT, OBAMA, OBAMACARE, POLITICS, TAXES
Based on data from H&R Block as we are halfway through filing season, it is apparent that compliance with the Obamacare penalty is still a difficult task.
This is the second year that the penalty has been levied; for 2014 taxes, the fee was $95 or 1 percent of qualified income — whichever was greater — and for 2015 taxes it is $325 or 2 percent of income, whichever is greater. The average penalty is $383, while last year it was $172, which corresponds roughly to the rise in penalty costs.
However, about 3/5, or 60% of filers “who received advanced tax credits to help them buy private plans on Obamacare’s web-based exchanges must pay a portion back to the IRS because they underestimated their actual income for 2015.” Interestingly, this is an increase from last year’s figure of 52% who had to repay a portion of their advanced subsidy. Thus, compliance and income estimation is getting worse, not better, after two tax seasons.
The average subsidy amount of that Obamacare enrollees must pay back has also increased slightly this year — $579, up from $530 last year.
In contrast, about 33% of taxpayers overstated their income and received additional subsidy funds from the IRS; the average amount was $450. Those that got the number correct and saw no adjustments was a paltry 3%.
The confusion is sure to continue with next year’s filing season. The minimum penalty for no insurance will double again to $695 or 2.5% of income, whichever is higher. H&R Block calculations show that for an average family of four earning $60,000 would pay $975 this tax season (2015), compared to about $400 last year (2014), while next year the penalty would rise to $2,000 (2016).
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, BUSINESS, ECONOMY, GOVERNMENT, POLITICS, TAX TIPS, TAXES
Every year, the various tax agencies calculate how many Americans do not pay a federal income tax. The 2015 tax year number estimates that 77.5 million households, which is 45.3%, according to the research Tax Policy Center. This number is only for federal taxes and does not include state income taxes.
There are two main reasons for the lack of federal taxes: either the household has no taxable income, or their tax liability is reduced and offset by tax breaks.
The research also calculated the various income levels from the richest and the poorest.
“The top 1 percent of taxpayers pay a higher effective income tax rate than any other group (around 23 percent, according to a report released by the Tax Policy Center in 2014) — nearly seven times higher than those in the bottom 50 percent.
On average, those in the bottom 40 percent of the income spectrum end up getting money from the government. Meanwhile, the richest 20 percent of Americans, by far, pay the most in income taxes, forking over nearly 87 percent of all the income tax collected by Uncle Sam.
The top 1 percent of Americans, who have an average income of more than $2.1 million, pay 43.6 percent of all the federal individual income tax in the US; the top 0.1 percent — just 115,000 households, whose average income is more than $9.4 million — pay more than 20 percent of it.”
Federal taxes are not the only taxes that Americans pay. Income, payroll, corporate income, state, local, property taxes, estate taxes, and excise taxes (which include taxes on gasoline, alcohol and cigarettes), are all various forms of taxation that are spread out and paid by households daily.
by | ARTICLES, GOVERNMENT, TAX TIPS, TAXES
Capital Gains and Losses – 10 Helpful Facts to Know
When you sell a capital asset, the sale normally results in a capital gain or loss. A capital asset includes most property you own for personal use or own as an investment. Here are 10 facts that you should know about capital gains and losses:
1. Capital Assets. Capital assets include property such as your home or car, as well as investment property, such as stocks and bonds.
2. Gains and Losses. A capital gain or loss is the difference between your basis and the amount you get when you sell an asset. Your basis is usually what you paid for the asset.
3. Net Investment Income Tax. You must include all capital gains in your income and you may be subject to the Net Investment Income Tax if your income is above certain amounts. The rate of this tax is 3.8 percent. For details, visit IRS.gov.
4. Deductible Losses. You can deduct capital losses on the sale of investment property. You cannot deduct losses on the sale of property that you hold for personal use.
5. Limit on Losses. If your capital losses are more than your capital gains, you can deduct the difference as a loss on your tax return. This loss is limited to $3,000 per year, or $1,500 if you are married and file a separate return.
6. Carryover Losses. If your total net capital loss is more than the limit you can deduct, you can carry it over to next year’s tax return.
7. Long and Short Term. Capital gains and losses are treated as either long-term or short-term, depending on how long you held the property. If you held it for one year or less, the gain or loss is short-term.
8. Net Capital Gain. If your long-term gains are more than your long-term losses, the difference between the two is a net long-term capital gain. If your net long-term capital gain is more than your net short-term capital loss, you have a net capital gain.
9. Tax Rate. The tax rate on a net capital gain usually depends on your income. The maximum tax rate on a net capital gain is 20 percent. However, for most taxpayers a zero or 15 percent rate will apply. A 25 or 28 percent tax rate can also apply to certain types of net capital gain.
10. Forms to File. You often will need to file Form 8949, Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets, with your federal tax return to report your gains and losses. You also need to file Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses, with your tax return.
For more information about this topic, see the Schedule D instructions and Publication 550, Investment Income and Expenses. You can visit IRS.gov to view, download or print any tax product you need right away.
Each and every taxpayer has a set of fundamental rights they should be aware of when dealing with the IRS. These are your Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Explore your rights and our obligations to protect them on IRS.gov.
Additional IRS Resources:
Form 8960, Net Investment Income Tax— Individuals, Estates, and Trusts
Capital Gains and Losses
by | ARTICLES, GOVERNMENT, TAX TIPS, TAXES
Free Help Preparing Tax Returns Available Nationwide
IRS YouTube Videos:
Free Help Preparing your Tax Return: English | Spanish | ASL
WASHINGTON –– The Internal Revenue Service reminded taxpayers today that they may be eligible to receive free tax help at more than 12,000 preparation sites available nationwide. The sites, generally located at community and neighborhood centers, provide tax assistance to taxpayers with low- and moderate-incomes and the elderly.
The IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program offers free tax help to individuals who generally make 54,000 or less, persons with disabilities, the elderly and individuals with limited English proficiency who need assistance in preparing their taxes. The Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) program offers free tax help for all taxpayers, particularly those who are 60 and older. VITA and TCE volunteers are trained and certified by the IRS to help with many tax questions, including credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child and Dependent Care Credit.
The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is a significant tax credit for workers who earned $53,267 or less in 2015. Last year, more than 27.5 million eligible workers and families received almost $66.7 billion in EITC, with an average EITC amount of more than $2,400. The maximum EITC amount for 2015 is $6,242 for qualifying families. In order to receive the credit, eligible taxpayers must file a tax return, even if they do not have a filing requirement. The VITA and TCE programs can help answer many EITC questions and help taxpayers claim the credit if they qualify. Taxpayers may also use the IRS.gov EITC Assistant to help them determine their eligibility.
Before visiting a VITA or TCE site, taxpayers should review Publication 3676-B to be aware of the services provided. To find the nearest VITA or TCE site, taxpayers can use the VITA and TCE locator tool available on IRS.gov, download the IRS smartphone app IRS2GO or call 800-906-9887.
For assistance preparing a tax return at a VITA or TCE site, taxpayers must bring all required documents and information including:
Proof of identification (photo ID)
Social Security cards for the taxpayer, spouse and dependents
An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) assignment letter may be substituted for those who do not have a Social Security number
Proof of foreign status, if applying for an ITIN
Birth dates for the taxpayer, spouse and dependents
Wage and earning statements (Form W-2, W-2G, 1099-R,1099-Misc) from all employers and other payers
Interest and dividend statements from banks (Forms 1099)
All Forms 1095, Health Insurance Statements
Health Insurance Exemption Certificate, if received
A copy of last year’s federal and state returns, if available
Proof of bank account routing and account numbers for direct deposit such as a blank check
To file taxes electronically on a married-filing-joint tax return, both spouses must be present to sign the required forms
Total amount paid for daycare services and the daycare provider’s tax identifying number such as their Social Security number or business Employer Identification Number
Form 1095-A, Form 1095-B or Form 1095-C, Affordable Health Care Statements
Copies of income transcripts from IRS and state, if applicable
The military also partners with the IRS to provide free tax assistance to military personnel and their families. The Armed Forces Tax Council (AFTC) consists of the tax program coordinators for the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard. The AFTC oversees the operation of the military tax programs worldwide, and serves as the main conduit for outreach by the IRS to military personnel and their families. Volunteers are trained and equipped to address military specific tax issues, such as combat zone tax benefits and the effect of the EITC guidelines.
In addition to free tax return preparation assistance, most sites will file returns electronically for free. Combining e-file with direct deposit is the fastest and most accurate way to file. The IRS issues nine out of 10 refunds in 21 days or less. Paper returns take longer to process. Taxpayers who chose to file electronically and owe, can make a payment by the April 18, 2016 deadline using Direct Pay. This IRS free service allows taxpayers to make secure payments from a checking or savings account.
Taxpayers that prefer to file their own tax returns electronically have the option of using IRS Free File. IRS Free File offers brand-name tax software to taxpayers who earned 62,000 or less in 2015 to file their returns for free. Taxpayers who earned more can use Free Fillable Forms, the electronic version of IRS paper forms. IRS Free File is only available through the IRS website by visiting IRS.gov/freefile.
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, BUSINESS, ECONOMY, FREEDOM, GOVERNMENT
A recent commentary on business tax policy by Richard Rubin in the Wall Street Journal had some very glaring errors and suggestive, misleading language.
For instance, Rubin discusses inversions in a way that makes them sound unjust and problematic –calling them a “discrete business-tax problem” that Congress has been unable to properly address. However, this is a patently false statement. Business inversions are perfectly legal, and sometimes the only just remedy for an anti-business climate that unfairly disadvantages American companies abroad by demanding both domestic and foreign tax revenue.
He later goes on to suggest that ultimate question plaguing and dividing Congress is: “Is the U.S. collecting enough money from wealthy individuals?” But when did class warfare become the driving force for government and economic decisions? Why is this the lens by which so many view various policies? Such a question is absolutely ridiculous to even consider. Why is the U.S. in the business of “collecting enough money” from “wealthy individuals?”
Thomas Sowell said it best when he remarked, “I have never understood why it is “greed” to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else’s money.” Such a question posited by Rubin is outrageously greedy.
His description of the 1986 IRC reforms was a total mischaracterization. Rubin writes, ”
“Until 1980, when the top individual rate was 70% and the corporate rate was 46%, the two systems were largely separate. Big businesses paid the corporate income tax, then when shareholders got capital gains or dividends, they paid again on the same profits. Small businesses paid as individuals.
The 1986 tax overhaul flipped that calculation, dropping the top individual tax rate to 28% and the corporate rate to 34%. New businesses saw little reason to become traditional C corporations that pay the corporate tax–unless they planned to go public. That has left the corporate tax as the domain of the largest companies. Meanwhile, states liberalized business-formation laws and Congress loosened eligibility rules for S corporations that don’t pay the corporate tax.”
Yet it’s he’s not exactly correct. With the IRC reforms of 1986, Reagan reduced the tax rates to 28% in exchange for getting rid of the tax shelters. As a result, the amount of federal income collected was more at 28% and a clean tax code than at 70% and 91% and tax shelters, because at 28%, it really wasn’t worth the time, cost, and effort to hide money.
Rubin also fails to explain the egregious set up for corporate taxes known as “double taxation.” It is
THE reason why these businesses file as non-corporate entities — so that they can avoid it. Here’s how it works:
Some companies, say a Fortune 500, pay taxes at corporate rates. The highest corporate rate is 35%. Right now, if a corporation pays taxes and reinvests its profits, there is no extra tax. But if it profits are given to the owner, they are taxed again on that amount–- which is knows as double taxation. Those business owners who wish to avoid the double taxation instead pay at individual rates, the highest of which is now 39.6% (which surpasses the corporate tax rate.)
Rubin mocks this set-up, writing “still, many pass-throughs think they are disadvantaged because the top individual rate of 39.6% exceeds the 35% corporate rate.” But they are disadvantaged. Why should businesses be taxed twice, anyway? Trying to circumvent an unfair, heavy handed tax-code on one end results in being penalized by a higher margin at the other end.
We get a further glimpse at what is driving some tax overhaul proposals. Orrin Hatch has suggested eliminating the second layer of “double taxation,” which is somewhat dismissed by Rubin when he points out that some situations might “exempt more income than necessary.” Getting enough revenue, then, is still the key driver at least on the Democrat side. This is reiterated a paragraph later when Rubin reveals that another overhaul proposal, to “deduct capital costs immediately and get a 25% rate” is also unacceptable — because “Democrats won’t tolerate the foregone revenue–and benefit to high-income households–tied to those plans.”
Why is getting enough revenue, and getting it from high-income households, the motivating force behind tax proposals these days? Why are so-called economists and analysts yielding to these class-warfare and fair share litmus tests when pontificating on tax policy? Businesses are the backbone of our country. Policy should focused on growing the economy, not punishing those who are successful. How can we honestly and morally consider taking more money from those taxpayers and business owners who have been able to create wealth and employment successfully — and just give it to the government and politicians who manage to continuously and egregiously squander income?
Rubin’s erroneous analysis was a disappointment to read in the pages of the Wall Street Journal.
by | ARTICLES, BLOG, BUSINESS, ECONOMY, ELECTIONS, FREEDOM, OBAMA, POLITICS
New Jersey governor Chris Christie has announced his endorsement of Donald Trump for President. Is he really so clueless? Perhaps he is just so annoyed because he lost to the real candidates that he is having a temper tantrum.
